What do you think of when you think of the tree of life? 

Do you think of something like a fountain of youth that would make you immortal if you were to take one bite of its fruit? 

Do you think of its fruit magically making your life more fulfilling? 

Or do you think of a tree that was out of reach for sinners?

Genesis 3: 22 And the LORD God said, “The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil. He must not be allowed to reach out his hand and take also from the tree of life and eat, and live forever.” 23 So the LORD God banished him from the Garden of Eden to work the ground from which he had been taken. 24 After he drove the man out, he placed on the east side of the Garden of Eden cherubim and a flaming sword flashing back and forth to guard the way to the tree of life.

In Genesis we have a sad picture of self-reliance as its own reward.  Now instead of trees yielding fruit for Adam and Eve, it would take hard work to accomplish it as a do-it-yourself program.  Instead of whatever carefree life existed before sin, it’s now a life with more worries than you can shake a stick at. 

The Fall of Man–instead of true life as it was meant to be, now it would be a life as it was never meant to be.

It would be death constantly nipping at our heels, threatening to steal our joy, and rob us of so much we hold dear. 

Outside of Eden–in the land of thorns and thistles–our lives would be spent in constant conflict between desiring to return to a place of blessing with full dependence upon God and the rubble of a life in perpetual denial of a need for God in a do-it-yourself world.

Fortunately for us, God did not leave it there.  That sword-bearing cherubim may have prevented Adam and Eve from running back in, but that was for their benefit.  Living our days in chronic sin and inner conflict is no life.  So Jesus came to rescue us and give us eternal life.

The tree of life returns in the Bible as a blessing for those who overcome because Jesus died for us.

Revelation 22:1 Then the angel showed me the river of the water of life, as clear as crystal, flowing from the throne of God and of the Lamb 2 down the middle of the great street of the city. On each side of the river stood the tree of life, bearing twelve crops of fruit, yielding its fruit every month. And the leaves of the tree are for the healing of the nations. 3 No longer will there be any curse. The throne of God and of the Lamb will be in the city, and his servants will serve him. 4 They will see his face, and his name will be on their foreheads. 5 There will be no more night. They will not need the light of a lamp or the light of the sun, for the Lord God will give them light. And they will reign for ever and ever. 6 The angel said to me, “These words are trustworthy and true. The Lord, the God of the spirits of the prophets, sent his angel to show his servants the things that must soon take place.” 7 “Behold, I am coming soon! Blessed is he who keeps the words of the prophecy in this book.

I, for one, am glad that the Bible ends with hope and joy and blessing. 

That tree of life returns to be ours.  It will be on both sides of the river, bearing fruit, crop after crop, and there will be healing. 

We need that. 

Revelation 2:7 He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches. To him who overcomes, I will give the right to eat from the tree of life, which is in the paradise of God.

There are many Fractured Fairytales of the Fall of Man.  In the movie, Walk the Line, Jerry Lee Lewis states, “We’re all going to hell for the songs we sing” as he explains about that “great big apple” and “Don’t touch it.” It reinforces the idea that Eve grabbed an apple from the apple tree God told her was off-limits leading to…

Fractured Fairytale #1:  Eve, being the brainless ditz and immoral woman she was, grabbed a great big apple and she made Adam sin.  It’s always been the fault of the woman alone, women are always on the prowl to seduce men, and women are always to blame.  Just ask any woman in a male-dominated seminary how she feels.  (Go ahead and laugh.  I’m over it now.)  Carried to the extreme it becomes…

Fractured Fairytale #2: Eve colluded with the serpent to seduce and destroy Adam, that stoic bastion of godly righteousness. 

You think I’m joking?  Wish I was.  From early theologian Tertullian (c. 155 – c. 240 AD): “And do you not know that you are (each) an Eve? The sentence of God on this sex of yours lives in this age: the guilt must of necessity live too. You are the devil’s gateway: you are the unsealer of that (forbidden) tree: you are the first deserter of the divine law: you are she who persuaded him whom the devil was not valiant enough to attack. You destroyed so easily God’s image, man. On account of your desert — that is, death — even the Son of God had to die.  (The Apparel of Women, Book I, Chapt. 1) 

Gotta hand it to those church fathers.  They sure know how to make a woman feel special.

Fractured Fairytale #3

• The man: “Woman, don’t eat from the trees.  I’m the man.  I know better.  You’d better let me pick the fruit.”
• The woman: “But I’m hungry.”
• The man: “You’ll get fat and I don’t want a fat wife.”
• Snake: “No calories, woman.  Chill.”
• The man: “Don’t do it!”
• The woman: “I’ll show you.” (Takes apple, eats big bite, but doesn’t die.)  “See?”
• The man: “Cool!” (Eats apple).
• Afterwards the man (adam) gets a name change to Adam which comes from adama, dirt.  Man’s name has been dirt or mud with women ever since.

The truth is the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, the “forbidden fruit” was never an apple, didn’t result in instant death, and it didn’t make Adam and Eve future Jeopardy winners with instant recall of all knowledge.  No omniscience from this fruit, but eating it did forever divorce them from childlike dependence upon God and reliance upon His loving guidance. That fruit was real but presents an image of anything we want apart from God.

Genesis 3:1 Now the serpent was more crafty than any of the wild animals the LORD God had made. He said to the woman, “Did God really say, ‘You must not eat from any tree in the garden’?” 2 The woman said to the serpent, “We may eat fruit from the trees in the garden, 3 but God did say, ‘You must not eat fruit from the tree that is in the middle of the garden, and you must not touch it, or you will die.'” 4 “You will not surely die,” the serpent said to the woman. 5 “For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.” 6 When the woman saw that the fruit of the tree was good for food and pleasing to the eye, and also desirable for gaining wisdom, she took some and ate it. She also gave some to her husband, who was with her, and he ate it. 7 Then the eyes of both of them were opened, and they realized they were naked.

For further thought:

• How do these misunderstandings of how the Fall happened contribute to dismissing both Creation and the Fall? 
• The man was with his wife.  What was his role?  What should have been his role?
• Do you ever wonder if your actions would have been different?
• We don’t know what the fruit was, but that it was pretty to look at and good for food.  God wasn’t withholding something good from them for bad reasons.  When’s the last time you felt like God was depriving you of something you wanted? 
• Are there any hidden ways a distrust of the opposite sex displays itself in your life or thoughts? 

Soon Lent begins.  An annual rhythm, a cycle, a circle, a question repeated:

Why?”

Every year I pray through what to do for Lent (not so much what to give up, although this year Lent begins on Ash Wednesday otherwise known as February 14th, Valentine’s Day much to the chagrin of vendors of chocolate, a favored sacrificial item).  Nope, I pray about what God wants to speak to me, to you, and to those in our lives during this special and sacred 40 day season of Lent that comes and goes each year with the regularity of waves on the beach.

I cannot escape what goes on in my life as I pray. 

Two movies have made me think lately. 

One I’ve seen, “Life of Pi,” and the other, “I, Tonya,” I will not see. 

There’s a question that arises from both, particularly as it relates to suffering. 

In real life, Nancy Kerrigan, the figure skater whose life was changed the day of the assault upon her, recently has been shown in video reliving the moment of her injury as pundits discuss the morality of glorifying Tonya Harding in a movie.  The news clip shown over and over again displays Nancy grimacing in pain, crying out, “Why, why, why?” 

“Why?” is a hard question.  It’s among the questions Pi asks in the “Life of Pi” movie script.

• Why would a god do that?
• Why would he send his own son to suffer for the sins of ordinary people?
• If God is so perfect and we’re not, why would He want to create all this?
• Why does He need us at all?  
• Sacrificing the innocent to atone for the sins of the guilty? What kind of love is that? (In other words, why?)

Lots of questions “Why?” in the movie, but there’s another repeated phrase that cycles like a rhythm and strikes the heart like a thunderbolt, a repetition each of us could utter:

I’m sorry!” 

Yes, the movie blurs the lines of world religions and that’s worth addressing!  It’s been making me think about the uniqueness of Christ.  After all, not all world religions are the same.  Thinking about Pi and his writing the digits of the number pi in class to change his name, and how it’s an utterly unique number. 

In his New Yorker article, “Why Pi Matters,” Steven Strogatz, professor of mathematics at Cornell, writes, “The beauty of pi, in part, is that it puts infinity within reach. Even young children get this. The digits of pi never end and never show a pattern. They go on forever, seemingly at random—except that they can’t possibly be random, because they embody the order inherent in a perfect circle. This tension between order and randomness is one of the most tantalizing aspects of pi.”

Jesus puts infinity within reach

…but a reach bridged only by faith. 

Why?  Yeah, it’s a hard question but a good one.

So, for Lent 2018, we’ll explore the questions of Pi and Chi (the Greek letter beginning the word Christos, which means Christ, Messiah, the Anointed One). We’ll ask and answer the question “Why?” as we discover the uniqueness of Jesus Christ.  Join me for the 40 days of Lent beginning February 14, 2018 by liking Seminary Gal on Facebook or having these devotionals sent to your email box which you can do via the sign-up on my Home page.  Thank you for blessing me with this opportunity to study together the Word of God.

===

Acknowledging that former years’ devotional series remain popular:

• Lent 2013 looked at The Letter to the Romans: Paul’s Masterpiece to reclaim foundations of our Christian heritage and began February 13, 2013.
•  A very special and ever popular offering was Lent 2014’s Be Still and Know that I AM God  which can be obtained through the archives beginning in March 2014. 
• Lent 2015 began on February 18, 2015 with a series entitled With Christ in the Upper Room: Final Preparations.  We explored what is often called “The Upper Room Discourse” found in John chapters 13-17. 
• ReKindle, the Lent 2016 series, began on February 10, 2016 and encouraged us to rekindle our spiritual lives.
• Light: There’s Nothing Like It was the 2017 Lent series and explored this metaphor often used to portray Christ.  It is archived beginning March 1, 2017.

Why, oh why didn’t God warn Adam about that tree? 

(He did.) 

***

Why, oh why did God put that tree there in the first place?

(Because the tree was good, even if the fruit of it was not ripe for mankind’s consumption yet.) 

***

Why, oh why didn’t God tell Adam what would happen? 

(He did. 

He said Adam would “surely die.”)

***

In Genesis 2:9, we see all kinds of trees: “And the LORD God made all kinds of trees grow out of the ground– trees that were pleasing to the eye and good for food. In the middle of the garden were the tree of life and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.”  About the one tree of knowledge, the LORD God commands, Genesis 2:16 “You are free to eat from any tree in the garden; 17 but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat of it you will surely die.”

A couple of quick points:

• The tree of the knowledge of good and evil was not an evil tree.  (God created it good and put it there which was also good because God only does good). 
• The consequence of certain death was not an evil consequence, but a natural one that would arise within the possibilities from the good and wonderful gift of freedom.  (Just as wrath is not evil but God’s appropriate action against our freely chosen sin which was never–of course–God’s choice for us.)   
• “Surely die” does not equal instantaneous death like a lightning bolt or execution.  (Death–and not just spiritual death–is what happens naturally when do things our own way.)

Food for thought: 

• Verse 16 says that Adam is free to eat from any tree.  Would it really be freedom if there was no actual choice available?  If you went into an ice cream parlor and there were only many containers of vanilla, would there really be freedom of choice? 
• There were many different kinds of trees in the Garden, so there was a type of choice available.  How much choice and what kinds of choice are necessary for true freedom? 
• What value do limitations serve? How is the tree of the knowledge of good and evil both imagery and analogy? 
• If the tree of knowledge of good and evil was not put there as a test, which theologians insist is the case, what good things might have resulted from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil if Adam and Eve had waited until God gave them permission instead of giving in to temptation?   

===

From the series Agricultural Imagery and Analogy in the Bible 

Two trees have had more ink spilled on their accounts than any other.  In Genesis 2:9, we see all kinds of trees: “And the LORD God made all kinds of trees grow out of the ground– trees that were pleasing to the eye and good for food. In the middle of the garden were the tree of life and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.”

***

Two trees singled out. 

A tale of two trees identified, hinting at the eternal difference they would make. 

Two trees in the middle of everything. 

Two trees of eternal significance, yet of the two trees, only one endures to the end of the Bible: the tree of life.

What are these two trees and why were they even there?  I’ve been assured by greater theological minds than mine that they weren’t put there as a test.  God isn’t frivolous, so they served some purpose and had value.  If that’s the case, then why (Genesis 2:16-17) was the tree of knowledge of good and evil (a merism like bookends for all things and an indication of self-discernment) forbidden? 

As we continue our look at Agricultural Imagery and Analogy in the Bible, I’d like to let these questions remain for a bit because imagery and analogy linger.  Life and Knowledge, the two named trees, were both at the middle and hint at relationship and importance.  

Food for thought:

• Read the connection God outlines between blessed life and true knowledge (wisdom) on our side of Eden. 

Proverbs 2:2 “Make your ear attentive to wisdom, Incline your heart to understanding; 3 For if you cry for discernment, Lift your voice for understanding; 4 If you seek her as silver, And search for her as for hidden treasures; 5 Then you will discern the fear of the LORD, And discover the knowledge of God. 6 For the LORD gives wisdom; From His mouth come knowledge and understanding.” (NAS)

Proverbs 3:13 How blessed is the man who finds wisdom, And the man who gains understanding. 14 For its profit is better than the profit of silver, And its gain than fine gold. 15 She is more precious than jewels; And nothing you desire compares with her. 16 Long life is in her right hand; In her left hand are riches and honor. 17 Her ways are pleasant ways, And all her paths are peace. 18 She is a tree of life to those who take hold of her, And happy are all who hold her fast. 19 The LORD by wisdom founded the earth; By understanding He established the heavens. 20 By His knowledge the deeps were broken up, And the skies drip with dew. 21 My son, let them not depart from your sight; Keep sound wisdom and discretion, 22 So they will be life to your soul, And adornment to your neck. 23 Then you will walk in your way securely, And your foot will not stumble. 24 When you lie down, you will not be afraid; When you lie down, your sleep will be sweet. 25 Do not be afraid of sudden fear, Nor of the onslaught of the wicked when it comes; 26 For the LORD will be your confidence, And will keep your foot from being caught. (NAS).

• In what ways does our culture challenge sound biblical judgment and godly discernment? 
• Does all knowledge lead to life?

“In a selfish act of laziness, God created Adam for slavery and shoved him into Eden’s trenches to work as a landscaper and even put him on a hyper-restrictive diet, laying down the law about what he could eat.”  Unfortunately, that is precisely the meaning that way too many people believe when they read Genesis 2:15 “The LORD God took the man and put him in the Garden of Eden to work it and take care of it.”  Of course, they wouldn’t come out and say it as bluntly as I just did, but their attitudes reveal that they believe it nonetheless.

That kind of statement is wrong, wrong, wrong. 

Shocking and wrong.  Did I say that? 

Yeah, it’s SO wrong.

Not selfish, not laziness, not slavery, not shoving, not trenches, not landscaping, and not restrictive.  Glad I got that off my chest.

Ok, Barb ol’pal, what do you think it means then? 

I’m glad you asked.  My meaning expansions are in the [parentheses]:  Genesis 2:15 “The LORD God [in a divine act of joy and generous delegation] took the man [His cherished and prized pinnacle of Creation] and put him in the Garden of Eden [God’s sanctuary and palace garden, a place of lush beauty, yielding fruit by command of God Himself] to work it [rule it, have responsibility for lovingly keeping it every bit the sanctuary it was from the start] and take care of it [by maintaining communion with God and keeping the order and beauty with which this sanctuary was created.  In effect, God was giving the man the highest honor possible: to maintain—by man’s God-given abilities and intellect—what God had established in creating man in God’s own Image and creating a sanctuary for joy, communion with God, and as worship of Him as our Creator.]”   

As we continue looking at Agricultural Imagery and Analogy in the Bible, the first occupation for man is a combination gardener and priest.  The image conveys everything from cultivation, nurturing, and stewardship of what God has given us… as an act of worship.

Food for thought:

• In general, is your unspoken expectation that God is out to bless you or mess with you?  In a situation where things could go wrong through no fault of your own, do you expect that they will or that God will preserve you from it? 
• When you think of Adam’s working in the Garden of Eden do you think of digging dirt and planting rows of corn or beans in the hot sun, or do you think of priestly duties? 
• How might changing your assumptions about work in the Garden change your attitudes about God and about the work He has you doing? 
• In Creation, God established order over chaos, light into darkness, form into the formless, and life into what He’d already created as a material world.  Even before the fall of man, God’s sanctuary needed to be maintained to keep chaos, darkness, and material forces from pressing in, disrupting the order.  Read Colossians 1:15-17 and Hebrews 1:3  Who really holds it all together?  How might Adam’s working in the Garden be both gardening and priestly as God’s Image-bearer?

Genesis 2:8 Now the LORD God had planted a garden in the east, in Eden; and there he put the man he had formed. 9 And the LORD God made all kinds of trees grow out of the ground– trees that were pleasing to the eye and good for food.

We can all agree that the Bible is not a science textbook or a research biologist’s journal.  But when you consider the Pentateuch (the first 5 books of the Bible) was recorded thousands of years before the modern era—even more than a thousand years before Christ—it’s genuinely remarkable what is written. 

Man was formed out the dust of the earth as were the other land animals (Genesis 1:20-25).  Those happened on “Days” 5 and 6.  God made all kinds of trees grow out of the ground as part of Third Day gardening.

Biodiversity, a crasis of the words biological and diversity, basically points to the variety of living organisms on Earth and their inherent and amazing variability.   

If you take the Bible as true, as I do, this diversity was designed from the start. 

All kinds of trees.  Pretty trees.  Trees for food.  Some are both. 

All display God’s wisdom, His appreciation for beauty, His preference of diversity over monotony, and His awesome creativity.

And yet, built into the DNA from the very beginning was future biodiversity.  Pretty trees could become varied and more beautiful, even without the help of geneticists and breeders.  Trees for food would develop greater efficiency and production because what was already built into the genetic code made it possible.  It is this pre-programming for functionality and future diversity in DNA that breeders use to feed the world.  God created for biodiversity and future productivity, giving us a clear picture of God’s existence, His wisdom, and His open invitation for mankind to rejoice in his Creator and to use the opportunity for wise stewardship.

Food for thought:

Consider the miracle of the genetic code and how DNA not only governs reproduction but also contributes to biodiversity.

When mankind decided to sin and fell from grace, what happened to the genetic code?  What does that mean for mankind?

Consider Adam and Eve.  One couple chose sin.  From one couple, many nations.  Many nations, One Redeemer, the Lamb (that is, Jesus Christ).   Revelation 5:9 And [the four living creatures and twenty-four elders] sang a new song: “You are worthy to take the scroll and to open its seals, because you were slain, and with your blood you purchased men for God from every tribe and language and people and nation. 10 You have made them to be a kingdom and priests to serve our God, and they will reign on the earth.” 

In what way do we see diversity of people (united by human DNA) affirmed in redemption as an expression of open invitation, even as the means of redemption remains only one Way?

The Garden of Eden—even the name suggests abundance, everything lush and beautiful.  The romantic view is that the Garden was a tropical paradise, replete with flowering plants and with jungle-like, untamed greenery both wild and wonderful.  Kind of like Costa Rica, only better. 

Sorry to pop your bubble, but Costa Rica and even Hawaii aren’t anywhere close to what the Garden of Eden was in Genesis.  Technically, it’s not even the Garden of  Eden, as if it was the sole garden of a proper noun place called Eden like Longwood Gardens of Kennett Square, Pennsylvania.  The very word Eden is in the semantic range of enrich or make abundant resulting in the Garden of Eden conveying meaning as Garden of Abundance. 

What was so abundant?  The streams arising from within the earth—Eden, the very source of water for sustaining life—made God’s Garden well-watered and the perfect place for perfect life to be perfectly introduced.

Genesis 2:4 This is the account of the heavens and the earth when they were created. When the LORD God made the earth and the heavens– 5 and no shrub of the field had yet appeared on the earth and no plant of the field had yet sprung up, for the LORD God had not sent rain on the earth and there was no man to work the ground, 6 but streams came up from the earth and watered the whole surface of the ground”

God had not sent rain and even when no man was yet to work the ground, the water was so abundant in Eden, it could not be contained.  It didn’t pool deeply in the Garden, but was meant to water entire areas outside of the Garden (Genesis 2:10-14). 

This was not rain water—a gift of the sky.  It emerged up from Eden, from within God’s abundance.

I wonder if Jesus had this life-giving, life-sustaining, arising from God’s abundance idea in mind when Scripture records this imagery, John 7: 37 “On the last and greatest day of the Feast, Jesus stood and said in a loud voice, ‘If anyone is thirsty, let him come to me and drink. 38 Whoever believes in me, as the Scripture has said, streams of living water will flow from within him.’ 39 By this he meant the Spirit, whom those who believed in him were later to receive. Up to that time the Spirit had not been given, since Jesus had not yet been glorified.”

Food for thought:

Read Jeremiah 2:12-13 about God’s people having rejected the spring of living water.  In what ways do we dig our own cisterns instead of trusting God in current culture?

About the day of reckoning, again we see living water.  Zechariah 14:8 “On that day living water will flow out from Jerusalem, half to the eastern sea and half to the western sea, in summer and in winter. 9 The LORD will be King over the whole earth. On that day there will be one LORD, and His Name the only name.”

In John 4:4-14, Jesus talks to a Samaritan woman about living water saying, John 4:10 Jesus answered her, “If you knew the gift of God and who it is that asks you for a drink, you would have asked him and he would have given you living water.” 11 “Sir,” the woman said, “you have nothing to draw with and the well is deep. Where can you get this living water? 12 Are you greater than our father Jacob, who gave us the well and drank from it himself, as did also his sons and his flocks and herds?” 13 Jesus answered, “Everyone who drinks this water will be thirsty again, 14 but whoever drinks the water I give him will never thirst. Indeed, the water I give him will become in him a spring of water welling up to eternal life.”.

In what ways might these be connected as imagery, recalling Eden, God’s abundance—living water—giving and sustaining life?  In what ways is water necessary for life?

Genesis 1:9 And God said, “Let the water under the sky be gathered to one place, and let dry ground appear.” And it was so. 10 God called the dry ground “land,” and the gathered waters he called “seas.” And God saw that it was good. 11 Then God said, “Let the land produce vegetation: seed-bearing plants and trees on the land that bear fruit with seed in it, according to their various kinds.” And it was so. 12 The land produced vegetation: plants bearing seed according to their kinds and trees bearing fruit with seed in it according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good. 13 And there was evening, and there was morning– the third day.

The Third Day is when gardening began.  And God proclaimed it was good. 

No flops in God’s garden. 

It was all perfect, as perfect should be.

Don’t you find it interesting that people always try to poke holes in the Bible, that it’s nothing but a bunch of fairy tales and myths?  And yet, here it is, as true today as it was then. 

Plants have seed that reproduce themselves.  Trees bear fruit and do so according to their kind.

Sure, there’s some genetic variability on this side of expulsion from Eden in which some offspring from seed produce genetic show-stoppers that today’s breeders work hard to attain, but in every bunch, there are some genetic flops, failing to grow or producing no fruit.  But the variability never results in apples producing sheep or alligators or even different kinds of trees.  Apples don’t become elms or maples or buckthorn.  Their seeds produce apples.

The words of Christ still ring true: Matthew 7: 15 “Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves. 16 By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? 17 Likewise every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit. 19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 Thus, by their fruit you will recognize them.”

Jesus, always one to have a good horticultural analogy in His arsenal, is talking about people, their hearts, and their fruit, but consider the consistency which He likens to plants.  For millennia no thornbush bears grapes.  Grapes bear grapes.  And it’s been that way since the Third Day.

Food for thought:

What kind of spiritual fruit do you bear?  How do you feel about others noticing the fruit you produce and whether it’s good or bad?  Does Jesus tell us to condemn them or just recognize them?